On affirmative action, AJC continues to oppose quotas, employed by elite American universities in the earlier part of the twentieth century to restrict the admission of Jewish students. At the same time, together with black and Hispanic civil rights organizations, AJC has supported a wide range of affirmative action measures designed to recruit, train and upgrade those who have been historically disadvantaged and discriminated against.
Several years ago, AJC filed a brief in the United States Supreme Court in support of the University of Michigan’s admissions policy that promoted diversity on college campuses. At the University of Michigan, an applicant’s minority status is one factor among many considered, including socioeconomic background, and whether the applicant is an athlete or the child of an alumnus. We argued that disallowing the consideration of race as one factor among many in university admissions would have the effect of eliminating meaningful diversity on American campuses. We have received very positive feedback from minority communities because of our position and for standing up in support of affirmative action when it counted.
The issue of immigration is another shared concern. As American Jews, we have maintained a consistent focus on immigration and refugee policy. AJC has supported increased “family re-unification,” generous immigration policies for refugees, government benefits for non-citizen legal immigrants and programs designed to educate and integrate new citizens. At the same time, we have both endorsed efforts aimed at reducing the flow of illegal immigration to our shores, and reaffirmed our support for the principle of earned legalization for immigrants who have been residing in the U.S. for a substantial period of time.
The third major area of shared interests with the Latino community is public education. AJC believes a rededication to public education on the national, state, community and family levels will help public schools fulfill their promise as democratic institutions and launching pads of opportunity for all children. Schools and communities must provide all students, including minority, immigrant, and economically disadvantaged children, with effective schooling, extra educational help, and support systems necessary to meet today’s demanding educational standards. We believe that for all students to succeed there must be equitable school financing; qualified teachers; effective school and school district leadership; parental involvement; safe, clean, and modern schools; and after-school and early learning programs.
AJC has advocated on some of the most pressing issues in education. For example, we filed a brief in the N.Y. Court of Appeals on behalf of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, and the court ruled that the state has for years under funded the New York City public schools, in violation of the requirement that it provide a “sound basic education” to all its children. AJC believes that “public education is the bulwark of our democratic system” and that the lower court’s bizarre holding that an eighth-grade education was sufficient preparation for productive citizenship in today’s complex society must be rejected.
Finally, AJC supports an issue that cuts across both immigration and public education, and deals with opportunities for young people who do not presently have legal status. AJC supports the concept of “student adjustment.” Many undocumented young people living in the United States were brought here by their parents when they were minors. They should not be penalized for the choices made by their parents. Accordingly, legalization should be granted to those students who have spent a significant portion of their lives in the United States, participated in the American educational system and demonstrated a desire to become contributing, productive and full members of American society. We also support the DREAM ACT, under which deserving students not yet legalized would be afforded resident tuition at state colleges and universities to the same extent as legal residents and citizens.
While these domestic issues resonate for us and our Latino partners, they are not the end of our cooperation. AJC reaches out to Latinos and other ethnic groups to join with us on core issues of concern to the Jewish community – support for Israel and combating anti-Semitism. Only where there is mutual understanding of the importance of fundamental issues to each constituent group, and willingness to stand up for each other when our survival is on the line, can there be a true partnership that will benefit both communities.
Jeffrey Sinensky is AJC’s general counsel and director of domestic policy.
Related Articles
2 users responded in this post
While I join with the AJC in its support for Israel and combating anti-semitism, I would disagree with Mr. Sinensky’s support of anything resembling amnesty for the millions of Latinos who are in our country illegally (yes,I dare use the politically incorrect term, “illegal” and make no apology for it)and I oppose the DREAM Act and all forms of so-called affirmative action programs which use race or ethnicity as a means of giving preference to any group. I believe strongly that every American should have equal opportunity in education and employment, but giving preference to any group, regardless of race, cannot, in my opinion, be looked upon as being “equal opportunity”.
I may differ with the AJC and Mr. Sinensky in how best to solve the current immigration crisis and other social problems, but I will always stand with the Jewish people in opposing anti-semitism and their support for the nation of Israel and I support immigration, but only if the immigrant comes as millions, including my forefathers, have before; legally.
I think that the Committee is working at odds with iteself in supporting what has been deemed “affirmative action”. While it is true that there have been quotas on the number of Jewish students allowed in universities in the past (and unspoken quotas presently in some places), most “minority” groups don’t see Jewish students as “minorities” to be allowed access for past discrimination. In fact, many Jewish students are denied entry in favor of “minorities” when there affirmative action. Why is that?
It is time to STOP defining people by their race and nationality and religion. If we want to give chances to those who are disadvantaged, then lets do just that, without regard to their ethnic characteristics.
Lets support improved facilities and education in disadvantaged areas. MOST Important, lets instill a culture f a DESIRE to LEARN and be productive-we have many models for this inn all communities
Lets make language curricul important in the education system from the beginning. We need to start speaking each others language and they will go a long way to learning about and trusting each other.
The Committee should be involved with educating non-Jews and Jews alike about the necessity of keeping religion out of government in the United States. Not every country need abide by this but it is essential that the US abide by it. Perhaps if the Latinos looked at the numebr of Muslims that are residing here they would see the importance of this factor as they, too, can be a disenfranchised religious group.
Politics as usual is not going to work I do not support your current position vis a vis the affirmative action . I also do not support what I see as your “leave it alone” policy in regard to church /state in the hispanic community in an effort to align with this group. It will be a loser in the long run
Leave A Reply
Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments